Why This Work Exists
Across many sectors, familiar approaches assume stable institutions, shared facts, and sufficient material security to support deliberation and reform. In many places, those conditions no longer hold.
As a result, people are asked to collaborate while:
material stress is increasing,
identities feel threatened,
institutions speak in the language of care while eroding its conditions,
and persuasion often backfires rather than builds trust.
Food For Us exists to meet that terrain honestly.
What Post-Partisan Practice Means Here
Post-partisan practice does not mean neutrality, depoliticization, or “unity.”
It means building capacity for cooperation without requiring shared ideology, while maintaining clear boundaries against domination, dehumanization, and extractive harm.
This work emphasizes:
shared material stakes as anchors for collaboration
discernment and triage, not universal bridge-building
responsibility without innocence or purity
cooperation under constraint, not ideal conditions
accountability to life rather than allegiance to sides
The aim is not consensus, but the ability to act together where action is necessary and possible.
Who This Work Serves
Food For Us is oriented toward people already working inside complexity, including:
those carrying decision-making responsibility within strained institutions
funders, strategists, and conveners navigating polarization and legitimacy loss
practitioners working on food, water, land, health, housing, or care
facilitators encountering the limits of dialogue-only approaches
communities seeking cooperation without collapsing difference
This work is for those willing to engage power, limits, and loss without retreat or moral performance.
How the Work Takes Shape
Food For Us supports this field of practice through:
Learning & Capacity Building
Courses, workshops, and talks that strengthen discernment, collaboration, and adaptive capacity.Strategy & Accompaniment
Long-term thinking partnership with organizations navigating governance, transition, or cross-worldview work.Facilitation & Convening
Structured spaces grounded in shared material reality rather than ideological debate.Writing & Public Scholarship
Essays and frameworks that offer orientation when dominant narratives no longer explain lived reality.
About the Work’s Origins
Food For Us is founded by Nicole Negowetti, a practitioner-scholar whose work spans food law, policy, community organizing, and regenerative practice.
Her book, Feeding the Future: Restoring the Planet and Healing Ourselves (Georgetown University Press, 2026), explores food as a diagnostic lens for understanding ecological collapse, democratic strain, and the deeper stories shaping how societies organize care and responsibility.
Food For Us is one expression of that larger inquiry, focused on practice, orientation, and collaboration in real conditions.
An Orientation
This work offers orientation to notice what is being normalized, discern where cooperation is possible or harmful, and remain accountable to life when certainty is unavailable.
The field is emergent, the conditions are uneven, an no one holds the full map.
What exists is practice, relationship, and the willingness to learn together.
Welcome. We’re glad you’re here.
Post-Partisan Pathways for Orientation and Shared Action in Times of Strain
A practitioner-oriented framework for working across political, cultural, and worldview differences by grounding collaboration in shared material realities such as food, land, care, and health, especially when institutions are strained and certainty is unavailable.
Food For Us is a field of practice for people working in conditions where inherited political frameworks no longer reliably guide action.
We support leaders, practitioners, and institutions navigating ecological limits, polarization, and declining trust, who are making decisions under constraint, without shared agreement, stable institutions, or the assurance of clear outcomes.
Rather than beginning with ideology, Food For Us begins with what sustains life: food, water, land, care, health, and the relationships that make collective life possible.
Post-Partisan Pathways emerged through food and land-based work, and is now applied across domains where material risk, institutional strain, and coordination failure are shaping outcomes, from governance and public health to climate, infrastructure, and technological risk.